netdev - Re: [PATCH 2/4] virtio_net: return NETDEV_TX_BUSY instead of queueing an extra skb.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200906022334.29428.rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Date:	Tue, 2 Jun 2009 23:34:28 +0930
From:	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
To:	Mark McLoughlin <markmc@...hat.com>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
	Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] virtio_net: return NETDEV_TX_BUSY instead of queueing an extra skb.

On Tue, 2 Jun 2009 05:37:30 pm Mark McLoughlin wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-05-29 at 23:46 +0930, Rusty Russell wrote:
> > This effectively reverts 99ffc696d10b28580fe93441d627cf290ac4484c
> > "virtio: wean net driver off NETDEV_TX_BUSY".
> >
> > The complexity of queuing an skb (setting a tasklet to re-xmit) is
> > questionable,
>
> It certainly adds some subtle complexities to start_xmit()
>
> >  especially once we get rid of the other reason for the
> > tasklet in the next patch.
> >
> > If the skb won't fit in the tx queue, just return NETDEV_TX_BUSY.  It
> > might be frowned upon, but it's common and not going away any time
> > soon.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
> > Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
> > ---
> >  drivers/net/virtio_net.c |   49
> > ++++++++++------------------------------------- 1 file changed, 11
> > insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> > --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> >
> > @@ -526,27 +517,14 @@ again:
> >  	/* Free up any pending old buffers before queueing new ones. */
> >  	free_old_xmit_skbs(vi);
> >
> > -	/* If we has a buffer left over from last time, send it now. */
> > -	if (unlikely(vi->last_xmit_skb) &&
> > -	    xmit_skb(vi, vi->last_xmit_skb) != 0)
> > -		goto stop_queue;
> > +	/* Put new one in send queue and do transmit */
> > +	__skb_queue_head(&vi->send, skb);
> > +	if (likely(xmit_skb(vi, skb) == 0)) {
> > +		vi->svq->vq_ops->kick(vi->svq);
> > +		return NETDEV_TX_OK;
> > +	}
>
> Hmm, is it okay to leave the skb on the send queue if we return
> NETDEV_TX_BUSY?

Certainly not.  That's a bug.  Incremental fix is:

diff -u b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
--- b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
+++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
@@ -524,8 +524,9 @@
 		return NETDEV_TX_OK;
 	}
 
-	/* Ring too full for this packet. */
+	/* Ring too full for this packet, remove it from queue again. */
 	pr_debug("%s: virtio not prepared to send\n", dev->name);
+	__skb_unlink(skb, &vi->send);
 	netif_stop_queue(dev);
 
 	/* Activate callback for using skbs: if this returns false it

Thanks!
Rusty.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html