[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200906051620.02868.rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 16:20:02 +0930
From: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: virtio_net: Set correct gso->hdr_len
On Fri, 5 Jun 2009 01:57:09 pm Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 01:51:05PM +0930, Rusty Russell wrote:
> > But are we allowed to make the assumption that skb_headlen() ==
> > skb_transport_header(skb) + sizeof(transport header) ? Or should we be
> > checking that here?
>
> We don't care. We just want to preserve whatever the OS gave us.
> If it's bogus, the backend will reject it or fix it up.
Right, understood now. It really is just a hint as to how much to copy. It
wasn't supposed to be that, as virtio_net.h:
__u16 hdr_len; /* Ethernet + IP + tcp/udp hdrs */
__u16 gso_size; /* Bytes to append to hdr_len per frame */
The host was supposed to be able to de-gso packets together relying on
hdr_len. But that's silly: it can't do TSO without knowing about sequence
numbers at least, and UFO without ip fragmentation offsets. ie. it might as
well calc hdr_len itself.
I'm working on a proper spec, I'll be sure to note this.
Thanks,
Rusty.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists