netdev - Re: [PATCH 3/5] can: af_can.c use rcu

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 10 Jun 2009 13:33:15 +0200 (CEST)
From:	Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ozas.de>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
cc:	oliver@...tkopp.net, hawk@...x.dk, paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	urs.thuermann@...kswagen.de, oliver.hartkopp@...kswagen.de,
	wg@...ndegger.com, vladislav.yasevich@...com, sri@...ibm.com,
	linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org, Trond.Myklebust@...app.com,
	linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] can: af_can.c use rcu_barrier() on module unload.


On Wednesday 2009-06-10 10:10, David Miller wrote:
>> Acked-By: Oliver Hartkopp <oliver@...tkopp.net>
>
>Please don't capitalize the "By" in "Acked-By".  Otherwise
>patchwork doesn't pick them up automatically.

Is not that a patchwork bug then that should be reported? Or a
missing feature to checkpatch? Do we need a CodingStyle for
SOBs now too, just for that?

(Personally I prefer lowercase after the dash too, but I wanted to
illuminate all sides of the box.)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html