netdev - Re: [BUG] net_cls: Panic occured when net

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1244635093.4186.12.camel@dogo.mojatatu.com>
Date:	Wed, 10 Jun 2009 07:58:13 -0400
From:	jamal <hadi@...erus.ca>
To:	Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...il.com>
Cc:	Minoru Usui <usui@....nes.nec.co.jp>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [BUG] net_cls: Panic occured when net_cls subsystem use

Apologies for the latency.

On Wed, 2009-06-03 at 11:27 +0000, Jarek Poplawski wrote:

> After the second look I have some questions:
> - if it's really aimed to skip checking by ->get() tp's before they're
> configured in ->change(), maybe instead of using tp_c to check this it
> would be simpler to generally skip calling ->get() for newly created
> tp's?
> - otherwise the current method probably needs adding a tp_c check for
> NULL in u32_destroy()?
> - it seems this method would also need adding a 'handle' lookup to
> the u32_change(); otherwise its 'handle' parameter isn't controlled
> for for uniqueness, unless I miss something?

Lets just ignore the need for these changes since the patch fixes them
for now. I would still like to make the changes i suggested but later
with more thought put into them.

cheers,
jamal

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html