netdev - 8139cp vs 8139too, request

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1244649729.14601.1.camel@plop>
Date:	Wed, 10 Jun 2009 18:02:09 +0200
From:	Pascal Terjan <pterjan@...driva.com>
To:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: 8139cp vs 8139too, request_module ?

Hello,
8139cp and 8139too both handle the same id and then test revision.

If revision is wrong they tell to load the other module and return
ENODEV.

Why not doing a request_module instead of printing a message ? 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html