netdev - Re: rfkill regression in net-next-2.6

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1245068686.23912.0.camel@johannes.local>
Date:	Mon, 15 Jun 2009 14:24:46 +0200
From:	Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
To:	"John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>
Cc:	Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@...tkopp.net>,
	Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: rfkill regression in net-next-2.6

On Mon, 2009-06-15 at 08:04 -0400, John W. Linville wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 10:54:17AM +0200, Oliver Hartkopp wrote:
> 
> > Any idea what changed in net-next-2.6 that could produce this behaviour?
> 
> The rfkill subsystem rewrite would seem suspect... :-)

Maybe this fixes it?

johannes

--- wireless-testing.orig/drivers/platform/x86/dell-laptop.c	2009-06-15 14:23:25.000000000 +0200
+++ wireless-testing/drivers/platform/x86/dell-laptop.c	2009-06-15 14:23:35.000000000 +0200
@@ -177,7 +177,7 @@ dell_send_request(struct calling_interfa
 static int dell_rfkill_set(void *data, bool blocked)
 {
 	struct calling_interface_buffer buffer;
-	int disable = blocked ? 0 : 1;
+	int disable = blocked ? 1 : 0;
 	unsigned long radio = (unsigned long)data;
 
 	memset(&buffer, 0, sizeof(struct calling_interface_buffer));


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html