[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A364ABB.6040704@hartkopp.net>
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 15:20:59 +0200
From: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@...tkopp.net>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
CC: "John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>,
Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: rfkill regression in net-next-2.6
Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-06-15 at 08:04 -0400, John W. Linville wrote:
>> On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 10:54:17AM +0200, Oliver Hartkopp wrote:
>>
>>> Any idea what changed in net-next-2.6 that could produce this behaviour?
>> The rfkill subsystem rewrite would seem suspect... :-)
>
> Maybe this fixes it?
Yes, that made it!
I booted with the RFKILL switch ON and OFF and the system and the LEDs are
working as one would expect it.
Thanks Johannes.
Tested-by: Oliver Hartkopp <oliver@...tkopp.net>
>
> johannes
>
> --- wireless-testing.orig/drivers/platform/x86/dell-laptop.c 2009-06-15 14:23:25.000000000 +0200
> +++ wireless-testing/drivers/platform/x86/dell-laptop.c 2009-06-15 14:23:35.000000000 +0200
> @@ -177,7 +177,7 @@ dell_send_request(struct calling_interfa
> static int dell_rfkill_set(void *data, bool blocked)
> {
> struct calling_interface_buffer buffer;
> - int disable = blocked ? 0 : 1;
> + int disable = blocked ? 1 : 0;
> unsigned long radio = (unsigned long)data;
>
> memset(&buffer, 0, sizeof(struct calling_interface_buffer));
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists