netdev - Re: [bug] __nf_ct_refresh_acct(): WARNING: at lib/list_debug.c:30 __list

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 17 Jun 2009 13:38:37 +0200
From:	Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
To:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
CC:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [bug] __nf_ct_refresh_acct(): WARNING: at lib/list_debug.c:30
 __list_add+0x7d/0xad()

Eric Dumazet wrote:
> IPS_CONFIRMED_BIT is set under nf_conntrack_lock (in __nf_conntrack_confirm()),
> we probably want to add a synchronisation under ct->lock as well,
> or __nf_ct_refresh_acct() could set ct->timeout.expires to extra_jiffies,
> while a different cpu could confirm the conntrack.

Before the conntrack is confirmed, it is exclusively handled by a
single CPU. I agree that we need to make sure the IPS_CONFIRMED_BIT
is visible before we add the conntrack to the hash table since the
lookup is lockless, but simply moving the set_bit before the hash
insertion should be fine I think.


View attachment "x" of type "text/plain" (860 bytes)