netdev - Re: [patch 0/2] af_iucv patches for linux-2.6.31

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20090618.013410.04304670.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Thu, 18 Jun 2009 01:34:10 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	ursula.braun@...ibm.com
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
	schwidefsky@...ibm.com, heiko.carstens@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: [patch 0/2] af_iucv patches for linux-2.6.31

From: Ursula Braun <ursula.braun@...ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 09:54:46 +0200

> Hendrik has built 2 af_iucv patches fixing inappropriate return code handling
> for sendmsg. They are built against linux-2.6.30. We would like to see them
> included in 2.6.31 - if possible.

These patches do not apply cleanly against Linus's current tree nor
net-next-2.6 which is what you should be subumitting patches again.

This late in the merge window it really behooves you to do anything
other than submit patches against the previous release... it's
almost guarenteed to fail, really.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html