netdev - Re: [patch 0/2] af_iucv patches for linux-2.6.31

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1245329094.14954.38.camel@braunu-laptop>
Date:	Thu, 18 Jun 2009 14:44:54 +0200
From:	Ursula Braun <ubraun@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	ursula.braun@...ibm.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, schwidefsky@...ibm.com,
	heiko.carstens@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: [patch 0/2] af_iucv patches for linux-2.6.31

On Thu, 2009-06-18 at 01:34 -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Ursula Braun <ursula.braun@...ibm.com>
> Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 09:54:46 +0200
> 
> > Hendrik has built 2 af_iucv patches fixing inappropriate return code handling
> > for sendmsg. They are built against linux-2.6.30. We would like to see them
> > included in 2.6.31 - if possible.
> 
> These patches do not apply cleanly against Linus's current tree nor
> net-next-2.6 which is what you should be subumitting patches again.
> 
> This late in the merge window it really behooves you to do anything
> other than submit patches against the previous release... it's
> almost guarenteed to fail, really.

Dave,

sorry, I did a git pull on linux-2.6.git first, and the af_iucv patches
applied cleanly on my system. Anyway, I understand that I have been too
late in the merge window. I will submit the patches against net-next-2.6
again.

Regards, Ursula

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html