netdev - Re: [PATCH -tip 0/3] expedited "big hammer" RCU grace periods

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 25 Jun 2009 09:47:02 -0700 (PDT)
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
cc:	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	davem@...emloft.net, dada1@...mosbay.com, zbr@...emap.net,
	jeff.chua.linux@...il.com, paulus@...ba.org, laijs@...fujitsu.com,
	jengelh@...ozas.de, r000n@...0n.net, benh@...nel.crashing.org,
	mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca
Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip 0/3] expedited "big hammer" RCU grace periods



On Thu, 25 Jun 2009, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> Our general preference is to zap code.
> 
> /me stares at:
> 
>   $ git diff --stat -M v2.6.30..v2.6.31-rc1 | tail -1
>   7743 files changed, 782278 insertions(+), 403162 deletions(-)
> 
> /me corrects himself:

Yes. Our general preference is to zap code, if only because it's so damn 
unusual.

When one out of a hundred patches actually has more removals than 
additions, we make a big deal out of it ("Look - I actually simplified 
things"). For the 99 other patches we never size in polite company.

Oh well. But every time we add lines, we do it with the _best_ intentions.

		Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html