[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090625175402.GB8852@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 10:54:02 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, davem@...emloft.net,
dada1@...mosbay.com, zbr@...emap.net, jeff.chua.linux@...il.com,
paulus@...ba.org, laijs@...fujitsu.com, jengelh@...ozas.de,
r000n@...0n.net, benh@...nel.crashing.org,
mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca
Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip 0/3] expedited "big hammer" RCU grace periods
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 09:47:02AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 25 Jun 2009, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > Our general preference is to zap code.
> >
> > /me stares at:
> >
> > $ git diff --stat -M v2.6.30..v2.6.31-rc1 | tail -1
> > 7743 files changed, 782278 insertions(+), 403162 deletions(-)
> >
> > /me corrects himself:
>
> Yes. Our general preference is to zap code, if only because it's so damn
> unusual.
>
> When one out of a hundred patches actually has more removals than
> additions, we make a big deal out of it ("Look - I actually simplified
> things"). For the 99 other patches we never size in polite company.
>
> Oh well. But every time we add lines, we do it with the _best_ intentions.
Indeed, I must confess that my recent patch removing about 1,000 lines
of code is not all that typical of my submissions...
Thanx, Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists