[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090630.201016.203484460.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 20:10:16 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: ebiederm@...ssion.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, denys@...p.net.lb, stable@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "ipv4: arp announce, arp_proxy and windows ip
conflict verification"
From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 19:27:17 -0700
> This reverts commit 73ce7b01b4496a5fbf9caf63033c874be692333f.
>
> After discovering that we don't listen to gratuitious arps in 2.6.30
> I tracked the failure down to this commit.
>
> The patch makes absolutely no sense. RFC2131 RFC3927 and RFC5227.
> are all in agreement that an arp request with sip == 0 should be used
> for the probe (to prevent learning) and an arp request with sip == tip
> should be used for the gratitous announcement that people can learn
> from.
>
> It appears the author of the broken patch got those two cases confused
> and modified the code to drop all gratuitous arp traffic. Ouch!
>
> Cc: stable@...nel.org
> Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@...stanetworks.com>
Applied and queued up for -stable, thanks Eric.
To be honest I didn't want to apply that patch, but it seemed
to match up with the RFC in question so I figured I had no
arguments against it :)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists