[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1248373648.23392.24.camel@fritz>
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2009 11:27:28 -0700
From: Robert Love <robert.w.love@...el.com>
To: davem@...emloft.net, Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
Cc: linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
gospo@...hat.com, devel@...n-fcoe.org
Subject: Re: [Open-FCoE] [net-next-2.6 PATCH 5/5] fcoe: Use
NETIF_F_FCOE_MTU flag to set up max frame size (lport->mfs)
On Wed, 2009-07-22 at 16:29 -0700, Jeff Kirsher wrote:
> From: Yi Zou <yi.zou@...el.com>
>
> Add a define of FCOE_MTU as 2158 bytes and use FCOE_MTU when the LLD is found
> to support NETIF_F_FCOE_MTU. The lport->mfs is then calculated out of the
> 2158 FCOE_MTU. Otherwise, we stick with the netdev->mtu, i.e., LAN MTU. Also,
> change the notification on NETDEV_CHANGEMTU event to bypass changing mfs when
> LAN MTU is changed if NETIF_F_FCOE_MTU is supported.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yi Zou <yi.zou@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
> ---
Hi Dave,
Please don't apply this patch to net-next. The other 4 patches in this
series should be fine without it. If this patch is applied to net-next
it means that most/all of the other fcoe features (that will go through
linux-scsi) become dependent on this patch.
I was hoping to push the other fcoe features as-is and then push this
patch through linux-scsi after the other 4 patches in this series had
been merged by you.
Thanks, //Rob
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists