[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A69AD0E.4020701@cosmosbay.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2009 14:46:06 +0200
From: Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>
To: Krishna Kumar <krkumar2@...ibm.com>
CC: davem@...emloft.net, herbert@...dor.apana.org.au,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...il.com>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH] Don't run __qdisc_run() on a stopped TX queue
Krishna Kumar a écrit :
> From: Krishna Kumar <krkumar2@...ibm.com>
> diff -ruNp org/net/sched/sch_generic.c new/net/sched/sch_generic.c
> --- org/net/sched/sch_generic.c 2009-05-25 07:48:07.000000000 +0530
> +++ new/net/sched/sch_generic.c 2009-07-20 13:09:18.000000000 +0530
> @@ -56,12 +56,8 @@ static inline struct sk_buff *dequeue_sk
> struct sk_buff *skb = q->gso_skb;
>
> if (unlikely(skb)) {
> - struct net_device *dev = qdisc_dev(q);
> - struct netdev_queue *txq;
> -
> /* check the reason of requeuing without tx lock first */
> - txq = netdev_get_tx_queue(dev, skb_get_queue_mapping(skb));
> - if (!netif_tx_queue_stopped(txq) && !netif_tx_queue_frozen(txq))
> + if (!netif_tx_queue_frozen(q->dev_queue))
> q->gso_skb = NULL;
This part might be a separate patch...
Are we sure these are equivalent ?
OLD)
struct net_device *dev = qdisc_dev(q);
struct netdev_queue *txq;
txq = netdev_get_tx_queue(dev, skb_get_queue_mapping(skb));
NEW)
struct netdev_queue *txq = q->dev_queue;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists