netdev - Re: net-next-2.6 phonet causes build error

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1248707909.28545.200.camel@violet>
Date:	Mon, 27 Jul 2009 17:18:29 +0200
From:	Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	remi.denis-courmont@...ia.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: net-next-2.6 phonet causes build error

Hi Dave,

> >> net/phonet/pn_dev.c: In function ‘phonet_init_net’:
> >> net/phonet/pn_dev.c:221: error: implicit declaration of function
> >> ‘proc_net_fops_create’
> >> net/phonet/pn_dev.c: In function ‘phonet_exit_net’:
> >> net/phonet/pn_dev.c:242: error: implicit declaration of function
> >> ‘proc_net_remove’
> > 
> > Oops. This makes me wonder why I did not get that one here on my test 
> > builds???
> 
> Because the headers on your platform with your configuration end up
> including linux/proc_fs.h indirectly.

this and similar automatic includes on x86 are still a problem. I always
try to compile test with a PPC based system, but even that architecture
has a lot of indirect includes. I would be happy if we could get rid of
these for x86 systems, but that seems a little bit wishful thinking.

Regards

Marcel


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html