netdev - Re: [PATCH 5/5] c/r: Add AF

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87bpn3o87o.fsf@caffeine.danplanet.com>
Date:	Wed, 29 Jul 2009 07:49:15 -0700
From:	Dan Smith <danms@...ibm.com>
To:	"Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@...ibm.com>
Cc:	Oren Laadan <orenl@...rato.com>, containers@...ts.osdl.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] c/r: Add AF_UNIX support (v6)

SH> At the moment you miss out on the security_socket_connect() call. 

Is that any different than the path involved when a process does a
socketpair() call?

SH> Still your code is so customized that perhaps an explicit
SH> security_socket_connect() call in your sock_unix_join() may be the
SH> way to go...

So, when I do the join, I really should run the check on both the
remote and local addresses, right?  The join operation is not really a
connect in the sense of being one-sided...

-- 
Dan Smith
IBM Linux Technology Center
email: danms@...ibm.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html