netdev - Re: [PATCH 5/5] c/r: Add AF

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090729145927.GA8377@us.ibm.com>
Date:	Wed, 29 Jul 2009 09:59:27 -0500
From:	"Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@...ibm.com>
To:	Dan Smith <danms@...ibm.com>
Cc:	Oren Laadan <orenl@...rato.com>, containers@...ts.osdl.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] c/r: Add AF_UNIX support (v6)

Quoting Dan Smith (danms@...ibm.com):
> SH> At the moment you miss out on the security_socket_connect() call. 
> 
> Is that any different than the path involved when a process does a
> socketpair() call?
> 
> SH> Still your code is so customized that perhaps an explicit
> SH> security_socket_connect() call in your sock_unix_join() may be the
> SH> way to go...
> 
> So, when I do the join, I really should run the check on both the
> remote and local addresses, right?  The join operation is not really a
> connect in the sense of being one-sided...

Ok well if a join is not a connect then ignore me.

I'll set a block of time aside to take a closer look on your next
submit.

thanks,
-serge
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html