[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090806.133518.263376332.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2009 13:35:18 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: eric.dumazet@...il.com
Cc: kaber@...sh.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org, markmc@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 net-next-2.6] net: relax dst refcnt in input path
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2009 17:40:06 +0200
> [PATCH net-next-2.6] net: relax dst refcnt in input path
Two things:
1) Don't use a boolean name like "noref" it results in using
double-negatives in one's mind while trying to read and understand
the code.
Call these arguments "need_ref" or something like that.
Also, use "bool" type.
2) I wonder about this:
> @@ -1700,9 +1700,15 @@ int dev_hard_start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev,
> * If device doesnt need skb->dst, release it right now while
> * its hot in this cpu cache
> */
> - if (dev->priv_flags & IFF_XMIT_DST_RELEASE)
> - skb_dst_drop(skb);
> -
> + if (skb_dst(skb)) {
> + if (dev->priv_flags & IFF_XMIT_DST_RELEASE)
> + skb_dst_drop(skb);
> + else
> + /*
> + * make sure dst was refcounted by caller
> + */
> + WARN_ON(!(skb->_skb_dst & SKB_DST_REFTAKEN));
> + }
> rc = ops->ndo_start_xmit(skb, dev);
> if (rc == NETDEV_TX_OK)
So, won't this warning trigger if we are forwarding to a device that
does not set IFF_XMIT_DST_RELEASE?
If I understand things correctly, in IPv4 when we're not delivering to
a socket, we don't take a reference.
We'll get here from the forwarding path with a DST, and the target TX
device has IFF_XMIT_DST_RELEASE clear, the WARN_ON above will trigger.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists