[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090806.134126.58668200.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2009 13:41:26 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: krkumar2@...ibm.com
Cc: jarkao2@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
herbert@...dor.apana.org.au, kaber@...sh.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH ver2] Avoid enqueuing skb for default qdiscs
From: Krishna Kumar <krkumar2@...ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2009 17:14:21 +0530
> -
> static inline int dev_requeue_skb(struct sk_buff *skb, struct Qdisc *q)
> {
> q->gso_skb = skb;
> q->qstats.requeues++;
> + q->q.qlen++; /* it's still part of the queue */
> __netif_schedule(q);
>
> return 0;
I'm dubious about this new qlen accounting scheme, does it handle
the non-bypass case properly? Can you explain how it works
exactly?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists