netdev - Re: Receive side performance issue with multi-10-GigE and NUMA

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090821152341.GA2998@localhost.localdomain>
Date:	Fri, 21 Aug 2009 11:23:41 -0400
From:	Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>
To:	Bill Fink <billfink@...dspring.com>
Cc:	Linux Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, brice@...i.com,
	gallatin@...i.com
Subject: Re: Receive side performance issue with multi-10-GigE and NUMA

On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 12:14:21AM -0400, Bill Fink wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Aug 2009, Neil Horman wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 03:50:44AM -0400, Bill Fink wrote:
> > 
> > > When I tried an actual nuttcp performance test, even when rate limiting
> > > to just 1 Mbps, I immediately got a kernel oops.  I tried to get a
> > > crashdump via kexec/kdump, but the kexec kernel, instead of just
> > > generating a crashdump, fully booted the new kernel, which was
> > > extremely sluggish until I rebooted it through a BIOS re-init,
> > > and never produced a crashdump.  I tried this several times and
> > > an immediate kernel oops was always the result (with either a TCP
> > > or UDP test).  A ping test of 1000 9000-byte packets with an interval
> > > of 0.001 seconds (which is 72 Mbps for 1 second) on the other hand
> > > worked just fine.
> > 
> > The sluggishness is expected, since the kdump kernel operates out of such
> > limited memory.  don't know why you booted to a full system rather than did a
> > crash recovery.  Don't suppose you got a backtrace did you?
> 
> There was a backtrace on the screen but I didn't have a chance to
> record it.  BTW did anyone ever think to print the backtrace in
> reverse (first to some reserved memory and then output to the display)
> so the more interesting parts wouldn't have scrolled off the top of
> the screen?
> 
The real solution is to use a console to which the output doesn't scroll off the
screen.  Normally people use a serial console they can log, or a RAC card that
they can record. Even on a regular vga monitor in text mode, you can set up the
vt iirc to allow for scrolling.

Neil

> 						-Bill
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html