netdev - Re: Receive side performance issue with multi-10-GigE and NUMA

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090826235826.GA430@elte.hu>
Date:	Thu, 27 Aug 2009 01:58:26 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	nhorman@...driver.com, rostedt@...dmis.org, fweisbec@...il.com,
	billfink@...dspring.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, brice@...i.com,
	gallatin@...i.com
Subject: Re: Receive side performance issue with multi-10-GigE and NUMA


* David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:

> From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
> Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 01:05:14 +0200
> 
> > And the thing is, we are not rigid about these things in the 
> > tracing tree and if this was a good change we would not mind and 
> > you'd have my Ack. The problem is that it's a crappy change and 
> > that Neil is refusing to fix it. So please fix it,
> 
> Thankfully, Steven Rostedt gave a much more useful and reasonable 
> response than you.

I'm sorry you got that impression, but you are a maintainer yourself 
so you might perhaps understand it why sooner or later, if a 
maintainer's review does not get acted upon, one has to insist on 
clean patches in stronger terms.

Unfortunately you took away the "do not apply the patch" option from 
me that could have avoided the stronger words and could have kept 
this discussion more polite.

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html