[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090830095745.GA5236@ami.dom.local>
Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2009 11:57:45 +0200
From: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...il.com>
To: Krishna Kumar2 <krkumar2@...ibm.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] sched: Fix resource limiting in pfifo_fast
On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 02:16:13PM +0530, Krishna Kumar2 wrote:
> > Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...il.com>
> > >> pfifo_fast_enqueue has this check:
> > >> if (skb_queue_len(list) < qdisc_dev(qdisc)->tx_queue_len) {
> > >>
> > >> which allows each band to enqueue upto tx_queue_len skbs for a
> > >> total of 3*tx_queue_len skbs. I am not sure if this was the
> > >> intention of limiting in qdisc.
> > >
> > > Yes I noticed that and said to myself :
> > > This was to let high priority packets have their own limit,
> > > independent on fact that low priority packets filled their queue.
> >
> >
> > Good point, but then logically it could be something like:
> > if (skb_queue_len(list) < qdisc_dev(qdisc)->tx_queue_len / 3)
> >
> > Of course, there is a backward compatibility question, plus
> > an sch_prio consistency question.
>
> Jarek, what is the consistency problem?
Currently pfifo_fast and sch_prio behave similarly wrt. tx_queue_len,
don't they?
Jarek P.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists