netdev - Re: [PATCH] net: sk_free() should be allowed right after sk

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4A9BBE12.4080206@gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 31 Aug 2009 14:12:02 +0200
From:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC:	jarkao2@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: sk_free() should be allowed right after sk_alloc()

David Miller a écrit :
> From: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...il.com>
> Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 09:30:19 +0000
> 
>> On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 11:15:36AM +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>>> From: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...il.com>
>>>
>>> After commit 2b85a34e911bf483c27cfdd124aeb1605145dc80
>>> (net: No more expensive sock_hold()/sock_put() on each tx)
>>> sk_free() frees socks conditionally and depends
>>> on sk_wmem_alloc beeing set e.g. in sock_init_data(). But in some
>> Very nice, but I hope David could fix btw. my "beeing" misspelling.
> 
> I will :-)

Thanks :)

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html