[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090831173710.GC2105@hmsreliant.think-freely.org>
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 13:37:10 -0400
From: Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next-2.6] drivers: Kill now superfluous ->last_rx
stores
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 06:34:50PM +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> Eric Dumazet a écrit :
> > Neil Horman a écrit :
> >> I still see a large number of drivers that update dev->last_rx, although its
> >> not all as I look through the list, so something definately seems amiss.
> >
> > Some drivers still update dev->last_rx for their own needs, not a core
> > network concern.
> >
> > But a cleanup is certainly possible on few other drivers, about a dozen
> > if I count correctly.
>
> Well, a litle bit more if we look outside of drivers/net
>
> [PATCH net-next-2.6] drivers: Kill now superfluous ->last_rx stores
>
> The generic packet receive code takes care of setting
> netdev->last_rx when necessary, for the sake of the
> bonding ARP monitor.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Acked-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>
Thanks!
Neil
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists