[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090902.232707.93089975.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2009 23:27:07 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: chas@....nrl.navy.mil
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, karl@...amoto.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] atm/br2684: netif_stop_queue() when atm device busy
and netif_wake_queue() when we can send packets again.
From: "Chas Williams (CONTRACTOR)" <chas@....nrl.navy.mil>
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 10:29:47 -0400
> This patch removes the call to dev_kfree_skb() when the atm device is busy.
> Calling dev_kfree_skb() causes heavy packet loss then the device is under
> heavy load, the more correct behavior should be to stop the upper layers,
> then when the lower device can queue packets again wake the upper layers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Karl Hiramoto <karl@...amoto.org>
> Signed-off-by: Chas Williams <chas@....nrl.navy.mil>
Applied to net-next-2.6, but Chas your email client corrupted
the patch by breaking up long lines:
> @@ -142,6 +142,22 @@ static struct net_device *br2684_find_dev(const struct br
> 2684_if_spec *s)
Like that.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists