netdev - [RFC] skb align patch

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090920142212.1106d2a1@s6510>
Date:	Sun, 20 Sep 2009 14:22:12 -0700
From:	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
To:	Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...il.com>,
	Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...u.dk>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC] skb align patch

Based on the Intel suggestion that PCI-express overhead is
a significant cost.

Would people doing performance please measure the impact of
changing SKB alignment (64 bit only).


--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/system.h	2009-09-20 14:08:40.922346912 -0700
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/system.h	2009-09-20 14:14:37.012371200 -0700
@@ -455,4 +455,14 @@ static inline void rdtsc_barrier(void)
 	alternative(ASM_NOP3, "lfence", X86_FEATURE_LFENCE_RDTSC);
 }
 
+#ifndef CONFIG_X86_32
+/*
+ * DMA to unaligned address is more expensive than the the
+ * overhead of unaligned CPU access.
+ */
+#define NET_IP_ALIGN	0
+#define NET_SKB_PAD	L1_CACHE_BYTES
+#endif
+
+
 #endif /* _ASM_X86_SYSTEM_H */
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html