[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1253689036.4458.22.camel@johannes.local>
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 08:57:16 +0200
From: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
To: Tomas Winkler <tomas.winkler@...el.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, linville@...driver.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, yi.zhu@...el.com,
inaky.perez-gonzalez@...el.com, cindy.h.kao@...el.com,
guy.cohen@...el.com, ron.rindjunsky@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] iwmc3200top: Add Intel Wireless MultiCom 3200 top
driver.
On Wed, 2009-09-23 at 02:38 +0300, Tomas Winkler wrote:
> +config IWMC3200TOP
> + tristate "Intel Wireless MultiCom Top Driver"
> + depends on MMC && EXPERIMENTAL
> + select FW_LOADER
> + ---help---
> + Intel Wireless MultiCom 3200 Top driver is responsible for
> + for firmware load and enabled coms enumeration
This seems like the wrong approach to me.
To me, it seems like you have a device that contains an internal bus and
allows bus enumeration. Typically, we would surface that bus in the
driver/device model and allow sub-drivers to bind to that by way of
exposing the internal bus, like e.g. drivers/ssb/.
johannes
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (802 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists