[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200909242230.33881.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 22:30:33 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@...mvista.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] 3c59x: Get rid of "Trying to free already-free IRQ"
On Thursday 24 September 2009, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
> Following trace pops up if we try to suspend with 3c59x ethernet NIC
> brought down:
Patch looks good, but IMO it'd be a little effort to convert the driver to
dev_pm_ops while you're at it (please see r8169 for a working example).
Thanks,
Rafael
> root@b1:~# ifconfig eth16 down
> root@b1:~# echo mem > /sys/power/state
> ...
> 3c59x 0000:00:10.0: suspend
> 3c59x 0000:00:10.0: PME# disabled
> Trying to free already-free IRQ 48
> ------------[ cut here ]------------
> Badness at c00554e4 [verbose debug info unavailable]
> NIP: c00554e4 LR: c00554e4 CTR: c019a098
> REGS: c7975c60 TRAP: 0700 Not tainted (2.6.31-rc4)
> MSR: 00021032 <ME,CE,IR,DR> CR: 28242422 XER: 20000000
> TASK = c79cb0c0[1746] 'bash' THREAD: c7974000
> ...
> NIP [c00554e4] __free_irq+0x108/0x1b0
> LR [c00554e4] __free_irq+0x108/0x1b0
> Call Trace:
> [c7975d10] [c00554e4] __free_irq+0x108/0x1b0 (unreliable)
> [c7975d30] [c005559c] free_irq+0x10/0x24
> [c7975d40] [c01e21ec] vortex_suspend+0x70/0xc4
> [c7975d60] [c017e584] pci_legacy_suspend+0x58/0x100
>
> This is because the driver manages interrupts without checking for
> netif_running().
>
> Though, there are few other issues with suspend/resume in this driver.
> The intention of calling free_irq() in suspend() was to avoid any
> possible spurious interrupts (see commit 5b039e681b8c5f30aac9cc04385
> "3c59x PM fixes"). But,
>
> - On resume, the driver was requesting IRQ just after pci_set_master(),
> but before vortex_up() (which actually resets 3c59x chips).
>
> - Issuing free_irq() on a shared IRQ doesn't guarantee that a buggy
> HW won't trigger spurious interrupts in another driver that
> requested the same interrupt. So, if we want to protect from
> unexpected interrupts, then on suspend we should issue disable_irq(),
> not free_irq().
>
> Signed-off-by: Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@...mvista.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/3c59x.c | 12 +++---------
> 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/3c59x.c b/drivers/net/3c59x.c
> index c34aee9..7cdd4b0 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/3c59x.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/3c59x.c
> @@ -807,10 +807,10 @@ static int vortex_suspend(struct pci_dev *pdev, pm_message_t state)
> if (netif_running(dev)) {
> netif_device_detach(dev);
> vortex_down(dev, 1);
> + disable_irq(dev->irq);
> }
> pci_save_state(pdev);
> pci_enable_wake(pdev, pci_choose_state(pdev, state), 0);
> - free_irq(dev->irq, dev);
> pci_disable_device(pdev);
> pci_set_power_state(pdev, pci_choose_state(pdev, state));
> }
> @@ -833,18 +833,12 @@ static int vortex_resume(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> return err;
> }
> pci_set_master(pdev);
> - if (request_irq(dev->irq, vp->full_bus_master_rx ?
> - &boomerang_interrupt : &vortex_interrupt, IRQF_SHARED, dev->name, dev)) {
> - pr_warning("%s: Could not reserve IRQ %d\n", dev->name, dev->irq);
> - pci_disable_device(pdev);
> - return -EBUSY;
> - }
> if (netif_running(dev)) {
> err = vortex_up(dev);
> if (err)
> return err;
> - else
> - netif_device_attach(dev);
> + enable_irq(dev->irq);
> + netif_device_attach(dev);
> }
> }
> return 0;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists