netdev - Re: [PATCH 03/31] mm: expose gfp_to_alloc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 1 Oct 2009 14:03:16 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
To:	Suresh Jayaraman <sjayaraman@...e.de>
cc:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>,
	Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...e.cz>, Wouter Verhelst <w@...r.be>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	trond.myklebust@....uio.no
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/31] mm: expose gfp_to_alloc_flags()

On Thu, 1 Oct 2009, Suresh Jayaraman wrote:

> From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl> 
> 
> Expose the gfp to alloc_flags mapping, so we can use it in other parts
> of the vm.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
> Signed-off-by: Suresh Jayaraman <sjayaraman@...e.de>

Nack, these flags are internal to the page allocator and exporting them to 
generic VM code is unnecessary.

The only bit you actually use in your patchset is ALLOC_NO_WATERMARKS to 
determine whether a particular allocation can use memory reserves.  I'd 
suggest adding a bool function that returns whether the current context is 
given access to reserves including your new __GFP_MEMALLOC flag and 
exporting that instead.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html