netdev - Re: [RFC] pkt_sched: gen_estimator: Dont report fake rate estimators

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4AC519B1.1090701@gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 01 Oct 2009 23:05:53 +0200
From:	Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...il.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC:	eric.dumazet@...il.com, kaber@...sh.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] pkt_sched: gen_estimator: Dont report fake rate   estimators

David Miller wrote, On 10/01/2009 09:37 PM:

> From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
> Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2009 21:07:51 +0200
> 
>> We currently send TCA_STATS_RATE_EST elements to netlink users, even if no estimator
>> is running.
>>
>> # tc -s -d qdisc
>> qdisc pfifo_fast 0: dev eth0 root bands 3 priomap  1 2 2 2 1 2 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
>>  Sent 112833764978 bytes 1495081739 pkt (dropped 0, overlimits 0 requeues 0)
>>  rate 0bit 0pps backlog 0b 0p requeues 0
>>
>> User has no way to tell if the "rate 0bit 0pps" is a real estimation, or a fake
>> one (because no estimator is active)
>>
>> After this patch, tc command output is :
>> $ tc -s -d qdisc
>> qdisc pfifo_fast 0: dev eth0 root bands 3 priomap  1 2 2 2 1 2 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
>>  Sent 561075 bytes 1196 pkt (dropped 0, overlimits 0 requeues 0)
>>  backlog 0b 0p requeues 0
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
> 
> I'm generally fine with this idea.
> 
> The new behavior is certainly more intuitive even to me :-)
> 
> Unless there are other objections I'm ok with this and I'll apply

Since you ask... I wonder about this whole int plus quite a bit of
struct unreadability for one flag only. Maybe it could be queried
on qdisc level (with a flag if necessary), and additional parameter
of gnet_stats_copy_rate_est()? (Qdiscs should have no problem with
setting this param for their classes too.)


Jarek P.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html