netdev - Re: [PATCH 2/2] [RFC] Add c/r support for connected INET sockets

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <8763apg57w.fsf@caffeine.danplanet.com>
Date:	Thu, 08 Oct 2009 10:34:11 -0700
From:	Dan Smith <danms@...ibm.com>
To:	John Dykstra <john.dykstra1@...il.com>
Cc:	containers@...ts.osdl.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] [RFC] Add c/r support for connected INET sockets

JD> Yep.  It sort of messes up your separation between layers, though.

In what way?  It's just this:

diff --git a/net/checkpoint.c b/net/checkpoint.c
index 3d6da68..f74ebe4 100644
--- a/net/checkpoint.c
+++ b/net/checkpoint.c
@@ -687,7 +687,8 @@ struct sock *do_sock_restore(struct ckpt_ctx *ctx)
        /* silently clear flags, e.g. SOCK_NONBLOCK or SOCK_CLOEXEC */
        h->sock.type &= SOCK_TYPE_MASK;
 
-       ret = sock_create(h->sock_common.family, h->sock.type, 0, &sock);
+       ret = sock_create(h->sock_common.family, h->sock.type,
+                         h->sock.protocol, &sock);
        if (ret < 0)
                goto err;

Which seems like a why-didn't-I-do-that-in-the-first-place sort of
thing...   Am I missing something?

-- 
Dan Smith
IBM Linux Technology Center
email: danms@...ibm.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html