[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1255025408.8033.25.camel@Maple>
Date: Thu, 08 Oct 2009 18:10:08 +0000
From: John Dykstra <john.dykstra1@...il.com>
To: Dan Smith <danms@...ibm.com>
Cc: containers@...ts.osdl.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] [RFC] Add c/r support for connected INET sockets
On Thu, 2009-10-08 at 10:34 -0700, Dan Smith wrote:
> JD> Yep. It sort of messes up your separation between layers, though.
>
> In what way? It's just this:
I just meant that you're peeking into the checkpointed sk data before
you create the new sk. In so much of your code, you manage to restore
structs as a whole, without peeking first.
> Which seems like a why-didn't-I-do-that-in-the-first-place sort of
> thing... Am I missing something?
Not anything that I see.
-- John
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists