netdev - Re: [RFCv4 PATCH 1/2] net: Introduce recvmmsg socket syscall

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20091009.142751.142357109.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Fri, 09 Oct 2009 14:27:51 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	acme@...hat.com
Cc:	caitlin.bestler@...il.com, vanhoof@...hat.com, williams@...hat.com,
	nhorman@...driver.com, nir.tzachar@...il.com, niv@...ibm.com,
	paul.moore@...com, remi.denis-courmont@...ia.com,
	steve@...gwyn.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFCv4 PATCH 1/2] net: Introduce recvmmsg socket syscall

From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2009 16:35:20 -0300

> 	The second patch in this series has issues, I still have to
> investigate it properly, study removing the skb_queue_head lock like TCP
> does, but the first patch seems to be OK and already providing good
> results at least as reported by Nir, if there aren't any other concerns
> about the API, can we get it into net-next-2.6?

Please make a formal submission of that first patch with all proper
signoffs and without the "RFC" in the subject line and I'll apply it.

Thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html