lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4ACFABAE.5050003@gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 09 Oct 2009 23:31:26 +0200
From:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:	Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>
CC:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, socketcan@...tkopp.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Generalize socket rx gap / receive queue overflow cmsg
 (v2)

Neil Horman a écrit :

>  
> +extern void __sock_recv_ts_and_drops(struct msghdr *msg, struct sock *sk,
> +	struct sk_buff *skb);

Surely you meant __sock_recv_drops() ? It only deals with drops.


> +	case SO_RXQ_OVFL:
> +		v.val = sock_flag(sk, SOCK_RXQ_OVFL);
> +		break;
> +

Hmm, I advise to use v.val = !!sock_flag(sk, SOCK_RXQ_OVFL);
So that application gets 0 or 1, not 0 or some big value.
Its better because it allows us to change internal SOCK_RXQ_OVFL if necessary in the future.

>  drop_n_acct:
> -	spin_lock(&sk->sk_receive_queue.lock);
> -	po->stats.tp_drops++;
> -	spin_unlock(&sk->sk_receive_queue.lock);
> +	po->stats.tp_drops = atomic_inc_return(&sk->sk_drops);

Yes :)

>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__sock_recv_timestamp);
>  
> +void __sock_recv_ts_and_drops(struct msghdr *msg, struct sock *sk,
> +	struct sk_buff *skb)
> +{
> +	put_cmsg(msg, SOL_SOCKET, SO_RXQ_OVFL, sizeof(__u32), &skb->dropcount);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__sock_recv_ts_and_drops);
> +

Just change the name.

And is it really too large to be inlined ?

In the contrary, sock_recv_timestamp() is so large that I suspect
your sock_recv_ts_and_drops should *not* be inlined, and include inlined versions only :

I suggest something more orthogonal like :

void inline sock_recv_drops(struct msghdr *msg, struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
{
	if (sock_flag(sk, SOCK_RXQ_OVFL) && skb && skb->dropcount)
		put_cmsg(msg, SOL_SOCKET, SO_RXQ_OVFL,
			 sizeof(__u32), &skb->dropcount);
}

void sock_recv_ts_and_drops(struct msghdr *msg, struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
{
	sock_recv_timestamp(msg, sk, skb); // inlined
	sock_recv_drops(msg, sk, skb); // inlined
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(sock_recv_ts_and_drops)

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ