[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20091013.003506.67125018.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 00:35:06 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: eric.dumazet@...il.com
Cc: w@....eu, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: TCP_DEFER_ACCEPT is missing counter update
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 09:23:59 +0200
> I dont understand why you want to decrement rskq_defer_accept here.
> We receive a pure ACK (wihout DATA).
> We should receive exactly one such ACK.
> (This is the third packet of the three way TCP handshake)
>
> How this can solve the problem you mention ?
> (ie, not sending an RST when we timeout the SYN_RECV session)
I'll hold off on this patch until Eric's comments are
addressed, thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists