[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091013051019.GA6159@ff.dom.local>
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 05:10:19 +0000
From: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...il.com>
To: Brian Haley <brian.haley@...com>
Cc: Rob.Townley@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Omaha Linux User Group <olug@...g.org>,
CentOS mailing list <centos@...tos.org>
Subject: Re: Ping Is Broken
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 07:30:26PM -0400, Brian Haley wrote:
>
>
> Jarek Poplawski wrote:
> > Brian Haley wrote, On 10/12/2009 10:36 PM:
> >
> >> In this case ping is doing an SO_BINDTODEVICE to eth0, so the kernel is going
> >> to force the packets out of it, even if it isn't the "correct" interface. If
> >> you ran tcpdump you'd probably see an ARP resolution failure, or an ICMP from
> >> a gateway.
> >
> > BTW, SO_BINDTODEVICE is used only to acquire a source address, not the real
> > connection (unless I miss something).
>
> No, SO_BINDTODEVICE affects routing, as well as incoming packets - it's in macros
> like INET_MATCH(), from what I've seen it restricts a socket to only use the device
> specified, irregardless of the source address you're using. For example, you can
> bind to 127.0.0.1 and send packets out eth0 if sk_bound_dev_if is set to it if I
> remember correctly.
I've commented your: "In this case ping is doing an SO_BINDTODEVICE to eth0",
so meant: SO_BINDTODEVICE is used *by ping* only to acquire a source address.
Jarek P.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists