netdev - Re: Possible bug: SO_TIMESTAMPING 2.6.30+

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20091110230352.65d369af@pundit>
Date:	Tue, 10 Nov 2009 23:03:52 +0100
From:	Christopher Zimmermann <madroach@...web.de>
To:	unlisted-recipients:; (no To-header on input)
Cc:	"Marcus D. Leech" <mleech@...net.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Possible bug: SO_TIMESTAMPING 2.6.30+

On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 09:12:52 +0100
Christopher Zimmermann <madroach@...web.de> wrote:

> On Mon, 09 Nov 2009 19:40:30 -0500
> "Marcus D. Leech" <mleech@...net.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> > I know that Patrick Ohly has essentially moved on from doing the 
> > SO_TIMESTAMPING stuff, so
> >    who's maintaining it now?
> 
> I worked on it a month ago or so and have a patchset from Patick Ohly
> and some changes by me which fix software timestamping and make the
> ioctl interface to the hardware more flexible (keeping backwards
> compatibility). Patches are attached.
> Still I never tried IPv6 and don't think the patches do anything about
> it.
> It would be nice to know weather software tx timestamps work
> with/without the patches.
> 
> 
> Christopher

Have a look at commit 51f31cabe3ce5345b51e4a4f82138b38c4d5dc91.
It adds support for SO_TIMESTAMPING in the transport layer, but only
for the ipv4 variants.
Good news is, it does look like it was simple to do the same to
ipv6/udp.c. Have fun.


    ip: support for TX timestamps on UDP and RAW sockets
    
    Instructions for time stamping outgoing packets are take from the
    socket layer and later copied into the new skb.
    
    Signed-off-by: Patrick Ohly <patrick.ohly@...el.com>
    Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>


But only in ipv4/udp.c:

-------------------------------- net/ipv4/udp.c
-------------------------------- index c47c989..4bd178a 100644
@@ -596,6 +596,7 @@ int udp_sendmsg(struct kiocb *iocb, struct sock
*sk, struct msghdr *msg, return -EOPNOTSUPP;
 
 	ipc.opt = NULL;
+	ipc.shtx.flags = 0;
 
 	if (up->pending) {
 		/*
@@ -643,6 +644,9 @@ int udp_sendmsg(struct kiocb *iocb, struct sock
*sk, struct msghdr *msg, ipc.addr = inet->saddr;
 
 	ipc.oif = sk->sk_bound_dev_if;
+	err = sock_tx_timestamp(msg, sk, &ipc.shtx);
+	if (err)
+		return err;
 	if (msg->msg_controllen) {
 		err = ip_cmsg_send(sock_net(sk), msg, &ipc);
 		if (err)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html