[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4AF927E4.7040306@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 09:44:20 +0100
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Christopher Zimmermann <madroach@...web.de>
CC: "Marcus D. Leech" <mleech@...net.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Possible bug: SO_TIMESTAMPING 2.6.30+
Christopher Zimmermann a écrit :
> On Mon, 09 Nov 2009 19:40:30 -0500
> "Marcus D. Leech" <mleech@...net.com> wrote:
>
>
>> I know that Patrick Ohly has essentially moved on from doing the
>> SO_TIMESTAMPING stuff, so
>> who's maintaining it now?
>
> I worked on it a month ago or so and have a patchset from Patick Ohly
> and some changes by me which fix software timestamping and make the
> ioctl interface to the hardware more flexible (keeping backwards
> compatibility). Patches are attached.
> Still I never tried IPv6 and don't think the patches do anything about
> it.
> It would be nice to know weather software tx timestamps work
> with/without the patches.
>
>
> Christopher
>
I see some sock_put()/sock_hold() stuff in your second patch.
We removed these things on transmit path, please dont add them back...
If skb->sk is set, it probably also has a destructor and a reference already taken.
(This reference being on sk_wmem_alloc by the way, not on sk_refcnt)
You probably can try to change skb destructor ?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists