netdev - Re: Possible bug: SO_TIMESTAMPING 2.6.30+

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20091110091252.1667d27d@pundit>
Date:	Tue, 10 Nov 2009 09:12:52 +0100
From:	Christopher Zimmermann <madroach@...web.de>
To:	"Marcus D. Leech" <mleech@...net.com>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Possible bug: SO_TIMESTAMPING 2.6.30+

On Mon, 09 Nov 2009 19:40:30 -0500
"Marcus D. Leech" <mleech@...net.com> wrote:

> I know that Patrick Ohly has essentially moved on from doing the 
> SO_TIMESTAMPING stuff, so
>    who's maintaining it now?

I worked on it a month ago or so and have a patchset from Patick Ohly
and some changes by me which fix software timestamping and make the
ioctl interface to the hardware more flexible (keeping backwards
compatibility). Patches are attached.
Still I never tried IPv6 and don't think the patches do anything about
it.
It would be nice to know weather software tx timestamps work
with/without the patches.

Christopher

View attachment "0001-timecompare-use-ARRAY_SIZE-macro.patch" of type "text/x-patch" (941 bytes)

View attachment "0002-net-software-TX-time-stamping.patch" of type "text/x-patch" (6336 bytes)

View attachment "0003-Change-kernel-timestamping-interface.patch" of type "text/x-patch" (11964 bytes)