[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4AFD6EB8.20406@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 09:35:36 -0500
From: William Allen Simpson <william.allen.simpson@...il.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
CC: Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [net-next-2.6 PATCH v6 2/7 RFC] TCPCT part 1b: generate Responder
Cookie
Eric Dumazet wrote:
> Small point :
>
> + if (unlikely(time_after_eq(jiffy, tcp_secret_generating->expires))) {
> + spin_lock_bh(&tcp_secret_locker);
> + if (!time_after_eq(jiffy, tcp_secret_generating->expires)) {
> + /* refreshed by another */
> + spin_unlock_bh(&tcp_secret_locker);
> + memcpy(bakery,
> + &tcp_secret_generating->secrets[0],
> + sizeof(tcp_secret_generating->secrets));
>
> Technically speaking, you should perform the memcpy() before spin_unlock_bh()
>
> + if (unlikely(time_after_eq(jiffy, tcp_secret_generating->expires))) {
> + spin_lock_bh(&tcp_secret_locker);
> + if (!time_after_eq(jiffy, tcp_secret_generating->expires)) {
> + /* refreshed by another */
> + memcpy(bakery,
> + &tcp_secret_generating->secrets[0],
> + sizeof(tcp_secret_generating->secrets));
> + spin_unlock_bh(&tcp_secret_locker);
>
Technically speaking is exactly what I need! I'd thought from your
earlier description of memory barriers that it should be after the unlock.
Done.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists