netdev - Re: [RFC] dev->refcnt long term holder

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 17 Nov 2009 09:58:46 -0800
From:	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	eric.dumazet@...il.com, herbert@...dor.apana.org.au,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] dev->refcnt long term holder

On Tue, 17 Nov 2009 00:30:19 -0800 (PST)
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:

> I'm trying to remember why we added this asynchronous link state event
> processing monster.  It probably has something to do with needing a
> sleepable context.  What's amusing is that linkwatch has repeatably
> caused RTNL deadlock issues over the years. :-)

I thought it was to handle:
 1) carrier on old devices would bounce, so it provides ratelimiting
    of state changes. Modern hardware and CPU's probably makes this a non-issue.
 2) wasn't there some code path with device changes, hotplug, uevent and
    udev that meant that we couldn't do notifiers immediately.

-- 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html