[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20091117.003449.153994565.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 00:34:49 -0800 (PST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: opurdila@...acom.com
Cc: shemminger@...tta.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
eric.dumazet@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ipv4: factorize cache clearing for batched
unregister operations
From: Octavian Purdila <opurdila@...acom.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 09:22:08 +0200
> BTW, it appears we don't have a route cache for IPv6. Right?
That's right, no IPV6 route cache.
But it doesn't seem to matter so much, as routing tables are
still small in that realm. Although I heard the trend is for
that to change.
I also suspect that with things like policy routing we could run into
problems, but we have a multi-way tree for the IPV6 routing table
datastructure explicitly to handle those kinds of things.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists