lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20091117193313.b750804e.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 19:33:13 +1100
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org>
Cc: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@...ia.com>,
Linux I2C <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Shared i2c adapter locking
Hi Jean,
On Thu, 5 Nov 2009 15:07:15 +0100 Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org> wrote:
>
> > Presumably this is meant for net-next-2.6, and you'll implement
>
> Actually I meant to push this to Linus immediately, through my i2c
> tree. This is essentially a no-op: the binary code will be the same as
> before the patch, so guaranteed to be safe, and this will solve
> conflicts in linux-next.
Any word on this?
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@...b.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists