netdev - Re: Shared i2c adapter locking

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 17 Nov 2009 10:35:54 +0100
From:	Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org>
To:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:	Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@...ia.com>,
	Linux I2C <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Shared i2c adapter locking

Hi Stephen,

On Tue, 17 Nov 2009 19:33:13 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Jean,
> 
> On Thu, 5 Nov 2009 15:07:15 +0100 Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org> wrote:
> >
> > > Presumably this is meant for net-next-2.6, and you'll implement
> > 
> > Actually I meant to push this to Linus immediately, through my i2c
> > tree. This is essentially a no-op: the binary code will be the same as
> > before the patch, so guaranteed to be safe, and this will solve
> > conflicts in linux-next.
> 
> Any word on this?

Haven't you read this:
http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-next/msg07839.html

and the 3 following posts?

If you did and something is still not clear, please let me know. My
understanding is that the action token is in David's hands now.

-- 
Jean Delvare
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html