[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20091120.092228.216274668.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 09:22:28 -0800 (PST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: william.allen.simpson@...il.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [net-next-2.6 PATCH v7 2/7 RFC] TCPCT part 1b: generate
Responder Cookie secret
From: William Allen Simpson <william.allen.simpson@...il.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 09:23:21 -0500
> +static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(tcp_secret_locker);
So connection creation scalability will be limited now because
we'll always have to go through this centralized spinlock even
for independent listening sockets, right?
Just wondering...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists