netdev - Re: linux-next: net/kbuild trees build failure

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 07 Dec 2009 14:04:03 -0800
From:	reinette chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>
To:	Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz>
Cc:	"John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>,
	Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-next@...r.kernel.org" <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: net/kbuild trees build failure

On Mon, 2009-12-07 at 13:42 -0800, Michal Marek wrote:
> It seems there is some misunderstanding.
> The original problem reported by Stephen was that linux/utsrelease.h was
> moved to generated/utsrelease.h in the kbuild tree (that commit also
> patched init/version.c and all other users known at that time). This
> change in kbuild broke the new iwlwifi in the net tree. Stephen attached
> the most obvious fix, i.e. change linux/utsrelease.h to
> generated/utsrelease.h in the iwlwifi source
> (http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/12/7/121). My suggestion was to let Stephen
> carry the fix in linux-next for now, and once one of the trees (kbuild
> or net) hits mainline, the other tree would apply Stephen's patch. Would
> that work for everyone?

I am not involved in the merging part and would thus not be the one
applying Stephen's patch. I would like the iwlwifi patch that uses
UTS_RELEASE as well as Stephen's fix to find it in the right place to go
in though (end up in linux-2.6).

> Now if someone wants to remove the DRV_VERSION macro from iwlwifi or rip
> the UTS_RELEASE part out of it, that would make this problem go away,
> but I don't think it's necessary _just_ because of the kbuild change.

This is perhaps something John and I should discuss separately.

Thank you

Reinette

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html