netdev - Re: linux-next: net/kbuild trees build failure

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20091207222853.GE18939@tuxdriver.com>
Date:	Mon, 7 Dec 2009 17:28:53 -0500
From:	"John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>
To:	Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz>
Cc:	reinette chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>,
	Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-next@...r.kernel.org" <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: net/kbuild trees build failure

On Mon, Dec 07, 2009 at 10:42:09PM +0100, Michal Marek wrote:
> reinette chatre napsal(a):

> > Right - could we please use the solution that works at compile time? I
> > used UTS_RELEASE after learning about its use in init/version.c, would
> > that not make it an approved solution?
> 
> It seems there is some misunderstanding.

Alright, if Stephen's fix is acceptable then your suggestion is fine.
Sam seemed to suggest that Stephen's fix was a stop-gap.

John
-- 
John W. Linville		Someday the world will need a hero, and you
linville@...driver.com			might be all we have.  Be ready.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html