[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1260785985.6167.29.camel@bigi>
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 05:19:45 -0500
From: jamal <hadi@...erus.ca>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: ja@....bg, hidden@...abit.hu, kaber@...sh.net, hidden@....bme.hu,
aschultz@...p10.net, tproxy@...ts.balabit.hu,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, rick.jones2@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: restore ip source validation WAS(Re:
[tproxy,regression] tproxy broken in 2.6.32
On Sun, 2009-12-13 at 19:10 -0800, David Miller wrote:
> Don't use binary attachments like that please.
>
> It doesn't end up in patchwork properly, and I need that to
> happen in order to track people's work effectively.
That was me venturing into git-land. This is how i normally send them:
cheers,
jamal
View attachment "src-valid-m3-1" of type "text/plain" (2822 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists