netdev - Re: [PATCH] net: restore ip source validation WAS(Re: [tproxy,regression] tproxy broken in 2.6.32

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20091213.191024.193699730.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Sun, 13 Dec 2009 19:10:24 -0800 (PST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	hadi@...erus.ca
Cc:	ja@....bg, hidden@...abit.hu, kaber@...sh.net, hidden@....bme.hu,
	aschultz@...p10.net, tproxy@...ts.balabit.hu,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, rick.jones2@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: restore ip source validation WAS(Re:
 [tproxy,regression] tproxy broken in 2.6.32

From: jamal <hadi@...erus.ca>
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2009 14:15:16 -0500

> On Sun, 2009-12-13 at 14:11 -0500, jamal wrote:
>> On Sun, 2009-12-13 at 13:38 -0500, jamal wrote:
>> 
>> > Of course. I will resend ..
>> 
>> Updated. Much thanks Julian.
> 
> Grrr. As a self-proclaimed master craftsman man i insist on blaming some
> tool. It must be git! Proper patch attached.

Don't use binary attachments like that please.

It doesn't end up in patchwork properly, and I need that to
happen in order to track people's work effectively.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html